They're pretty much all doing it now; releasing premium bourbons and charging a premium price. I touched on this in my BTAC post back in October and for the last number of years, we've seen an increase in super or premium bourbon offerings. Let me create a list here and see if I can capture a good sampling:
Buffalo Trace - Antique Collection consists of William LaRue Weller, George T. Stagg, Eagle Rare, Sazerac and Thomas H. Handy. Collection first released in 2000.
Heaven Hill - Parkers Heritage Collection first released in 2007 with a batch of three, the first being the best.
Jim Beam – Bookers Bourbon which is considered the first premium release way back in 1992 according to the Beam website.
Four Roses – First released the 40th Anniversary, followed by the 120th Anniversary, Mariage, Limited Edition 2009 and now they've announced a new release of 17 year old single barrel 100th Anniversary.
Brown Foreman – They haven't really jumped onto the premium bandwagon. They did release a Repeal bourbon a couple years back but that came in a 375ml gift package. BF also does their annual Birthday Bourbon release and while not that expensive, is limited and could be considered premium.
Kentucky Bourbon Distillers – Drew and his crew release some premium bourbons under the Willett, Vintage, Noahs Mill and Rowans Creek labels. They have some good bourbon that come from a variety of distilleries.
Wild Turkey – For a number of years now, Wild Turkey offered Kentucky Spirit which could be viewed as a premium as it's a single barrel at 101 proof but beyond that, Wild Turkey released Tribute a limited release of about 5,500 bottles, American Spirit and American Tradition.
Makers Mark – they've completely ignored the premium market instead sticking with their standard product. Just recently they announced a release of a new 94 proof variation that's getting some interest but I wouldn't consider this release in the premium category
Old Rip Van Winkle – this line of bourbon resides with Buffalo Trace but is managed by Julian Van Winkle. I do consider their 20 and 23 year old bourbons to be premium but in age and price only. I like the 20 year but find the 23 year to be overly astringent and woody. They also just released a 23 year old bourbon under the Old Rip Van Winkle label which comes in a decanter and gift box.
I think this gives us a pretty good idea of the premium bourbons out on the open market. There are a couple of advantages that premium bourbons offer over the standard shelf selections namely age and proof. Possibly a secondary benefit would be greater attention to storage as in the case of the Old Rip Van Winkle 23 year which was stored in the lowest part of the rick house.
As a general rule, I like higher proof bourbons; not because I'm a manly man (well maybe I am) but because it gives me control over the drinking proof. Purchasing an 80 proof bourbon locks me into one proof. Purchasing a George T. Stagg allows me to vary the proof to my drinking satisfaction. The age is another important factor as extra age provides greater depth and a longer co-mingling of the various flavor elements of the bourbon. Please keep in mind that older (age) isn't always better as I found with the Pappy Van Winkle 23 year and the Weller 19 year; both astringent and woody. I also mentioned storage location which plays an important role in the overall aging process. Any barrel high up in the rick house will age faster being subject to greater extremes of heat and cold while a barrel stored at the lowest point is less susceptible to these extremes thus aging more gracefully. A couple of my favorite premium releases was the first Parkers Heritage release in 2007 batch 1 which was about 11 years old barrel strength and William LaRue Weller from 2006 at 15 years barrel strength. These two are great examples of a super premium bourbon that's worth the extra money they command.
I for one like the fact that distilleries offer the premium bourbons as it adds another dimension to my overall bourbon experience. For most folks, these premium bourbons won't be everyday drinkers and will be set aside for those times when you want the complexity and contemplation that goes with a bourbon such as this. I know some of you think it's silly to lay down a three or four Jacksons on a bourbon but sometimes it's nice to have a premium in the wings.
Do you not consider the Birthday Bourbons by Brown Foreman to be premium. It may not be premium in cost(normally around 40 bucks) but they are an additional aged bourbon that I for one look forward to every year.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDan - thanks for pointing out the OFBB, I've made the edits to the post.
ReplyDeleteHow about the Woodford Reserve Master's Collection?
ReplyDelete2nd that OFBB are definitely a premium.
ReplyDeleteAlso I would say from KBD while Noah's Mill and Rowan Creek used to be good bourbons, they now no longer have age statements are just run of the mill to bad bourbons. I'm guessing they are still selling because enough fools don't have a clue they dropped the age statements.
I can't speak to the current RC or NM but I have a bottle of Rowans from a couple years ago that is pretty good and NAS.
ReplyDeleteBlanton's was in the forefront of premium bottlings, and came out virtually the same time as Booker's. The reason I remember this is that I was in a bar in eastern PA at the time and noticed the Booker's for the first time anywhere, though I had heard of it.
ReplyDeleteI asked for a pour, and the attractive brunette behind the bar immediately asked if I'd heard of Blanton's. She insisted I try that one (on her), in addition to the Booker's, and my course was charted from then on. I owe her a debt of gratitude, though now that Blanton's has hit $50, I no longer partake. Sigh...
I would agree in part. Blanton's Original lacks age or proof but is priced close to premiums. It is a single barrel so that's a consideration. If you were talking about Blanton's Gold or SFTB, I would agree that places it into the premium category but maybe I'm splitting hairs. What these posts show is that premium really has a wider definition amongst us enthusiasts.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of premium releases even though I normally cannot afford them. I guess I like knowing they are there, and that when a windfall comes my way, I can partake. I also think they do a little innovating that might rub off in a good way on their more affordable stuff. Like the idea of rebarreling. I think we may begin to see more and more whiskeys that are rebarreled and available at a reasonable albeit midshelf and above price.
ReplyDeleteGreat post!
ReplyDeleteSku is right on the Woodford Master Collection. Those should be part of the list.
If you like higher proofs, give that Thomas H. Handy Rye a try. I have that, the Eagle 17, and the George T Stagg on my bar and love every minute of each one. I disagree on the PVW 20 vs 23yr but everyone has their own tastes. I do find the 20yr to be quite awesome though and at about 1/2 the price its probably the better buy.
Went to a free Macallan tasting last night. Confirmed my feelings that scotch is for Euro sissies :)